The alteration of substrate specificity is one of the most challenging
goals of protein engineering and protein design. In the case of RNase T1,
a target has been to alter the specificity from guanosine in the
-position to adenosine. In early approaches, theoretical structure
predictions were used to ``design'' proteins with altered
properties[33] by exchanging amino acids in
the binding pocket of the enzyme. Being unsuccessful this
way[25], so-called semi-rational
methods were applied via random mutagenesis of selected amino
acids. In a first approach, the amino acids 41 to 46 - the area of
substrate recognition (see 1.2.2) - were randomly
exchanged to obtain a library of different variants. Apart from a
number of enzymes with unchanged specificity, one variant (8/3) could be
found with a noticeable increased affinity towards adenosine in the
subsite. However, though this variant had an
5',3'-ApC/5',3'-GpC preference of
0.1 (in contrast to RNase T1 with 2.5
10
), it still
preferred guanosine at the
subsite and had an activity well below
the activity of the wild type (1.2 per
cent)[35]. Another variant
(9/5) from this library characterised by KATJA HÖSCHLER
et al. [34] appears to be a promising
starting point for a further rational protein modification with
altered specificity (RNase T1 RV (sequence altered between amino acid
residue 41 and 46 to EFRNWN), RIKO CZAJA, personal
communication).