Specificity of RNase T1 next up previous contents
Next: Protein design and specificity Up: Ribonuclease T1: a model Previous: Reaction mechanism   Contents


Specificity of RNase T1


Table 1.1: Kinetic constants characterising the RNase T1 catalysed cleavage of minimal substrates. a) pH 5.0, 25$ ^\circ$C, ionic strength: 0.2M [88]; b) pH 7.5, 37$ ^\circ$C, 50mM Tris-HCl, 1mM EDTA [28]
Substrate $ k_{cat}$ $ K_m$ $ {}^{k_{cat}}\!\!/\!{}_{K_m}$ Reference
  $ s^{-1}$ $ \mu$M $ M^{-1}s^{-1}$  
GpA 84 67 130,000 a
GpC 400 180 220,000 a
GpG 57 37 150,000 a
GpU 33 29 110,000 a
pGpC 1,260 536 240,000 b
ApA     3 a
ApC     5 a
ApG     2 a
ApU     1 a

RNase T1 has a definite preference for a guanosine at its $ G_S^B$ site and a cytidine as a leaving group at the $ N1_S^B$ position[88] with minimal RNA substrates (e.g. dinucleotide monophosphates). As shown in table 1.1, the catalytic efficiency ( $ {}^{k_{cat}}\!\!/\!{}_{K_m}$) is 10$ ^5$ fold greater for 5',3'-GpN than for the corresponding 5',3'-ApN, and at least 10$ ^8$ fold greater than corresponding 5',3'-CpN and 5',3'-UpN (data not shown). The higher efficiency and $ k_{cat}$ for the pGpC substrate suggests the existence of a $ 1p$ site. The possibility of an $ 2p$ site has been supported by binding differences between different dinucleotides[89], but there are no further indications for this. Using site directed mutagenesis to construct certain variants modified in the binding or active site, kinetic studies have been conducted which lead to the ``two-binding-site'' kinetic model (with $ G_S^B-p1$ as one site and $ N1_S^B$ as the other site)[79]. According to this model, subsite binding energy is converted into chemical activation energy. Structures of different RNaseT1$ \cdot $inhibitor complexes, where a putative $ N1_S^B$ is occupied, have been reported[51] too. The existence of a $ 1N_S^B$ has been indicated by binding studies[89,86] and verified and further explored by pH dependent steady-state kinetic studies of RNase T1 [61]. From the results described in the literature so far, an ``optimal'' recognition sequence for RNase T1 can be assumed which is

\framebox{5'\xspace ---\dots--p--A--p--G--p--C--\dots---3'\xspace }

with intrinsic $ -\Delta G$ values for the particular binding sites as shown in table 1.2[87]. Unfortunately, most investigations have been conducted with very short substrates (di- and trinucleotides or analoga), so that there are almost no information considering subsites beyond $ 2p$ and $ N1$. Attempts to use an oligonucleotide with 15 nucleotides have been undertaken[42,43], but the information obtained from these experiments were still insufficient for a further elucidation of subsites and mechanism.


Table 1.2: Free binding energies of the RNase T1 subsites as $ -\Delta G$ in $ {}^{kJ}\!\!/\!{}_{mol}$ [87]
  $ G^B$ $ \gg$ $ G_S$ $ \ge$ $ 2p$ $ >$ $ 1N_S$ $ =$ $ p1$ $ >$ $ 1N^B$ $ >$ $ N1$
$ -\Delta G$ 16.7   4.2   3.9   3.1   3.0   1.8   0


next up previous contents
Next: Protein design and specificity Up: Ribonuclease T1: a model Previous: Reaction mechanism   Contents
Gunter Kuhnle 2001-06-04